What is the NW Forest Plan & Understanding What’s At Stake

DATE: Tuesday, May 21
TIME: 12pm

THIS EVENT IS OVER.

Cascadia Wildlands is a member of the Pacific Northwest Forest Climate Alliance (PNWFCA), the host of this webinar series.

BACKGROUND:

Following years of grassroots organizing to protect the last remaining Pacific Northwest (PNW) old-growth forests and ecosystems, the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) was created in 1994. For 30 years, the NWFP amended all national forest and BLM management plans in western Washington, Oregon, and northern California . It was an imperfect compromise that aimed to protect and restore old-growth forest and streams for hundreds of old-forest associated  species within the range of the federally threatened northern spotted owl, while still providing for limited timber harvest on federal  lands.

A lot has changed since the mid 1990s, from fashion trends to the climate crisis, and now the federal government is working to revise the NWFP over the course of this year. It is crucial that the public weighs in on the proposed changes to the NWFP, as it will set the course for how our federal forest lands–including our last remaining mature & old growth forests–are managed for decades to come.

The stakes of the NWFP Amendment are huge–for our last remaining mature & old growth forests, for the livability of our climate, for threatened & endangered species, and improper fire-risk reduction management for forests and communities.Over the life of the plan, the NWFP prevented an estimated ~130 million tons of carbon emissions from making the climate crisis worse–the equivalent of running several coal plants every year! The NWFP Amendment is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to establish better protections for mature and old growth forests, meaningful relationships with Indigenous communities and a fighting chance at mitigating the climate crisis.

This webinar will be an introduction to the NWFP and the amendment process for advocates & members of the public who are interested in forest & climate protection but don’t already know much about the NWFP or the Amendment. Our goal is to increase public awareness and engagement ahead of a public comment period happening later this summer. The second webinar in the series (happening in June) will build off this by highlighting specific concerns with the proposed Amendment and offer opportunities to take action.

The post Webinar: What is the NW Forest Plan — May 21 first appeared on Cascadia Wildlands.

Join sponsors Cascadia Wildlands and Land Air Water in hosting architects of the landmark 1994 Northwest Forest Plan, Drs. Norm Johnson, Jerry Franklin, and Gordie Reeves, for a presentation about their new book, “Making of the Northwest Forest Plan.”

The discussion will be facilitated by lawyer and conservationist Susan Jane Brown.

• WHEN: Friday, October 13
• TIME: 12-1:30pm
• LOCATION: Room 184 of the Knight Law Center, University of Oregon in Eugene, OR (1515 Agate St, Eugene, OR 97403)

The event is free, accessible and open to the public.

The post “Making of the Northwest Forest Plan” Discussion — Oct 13 first appeared on Cascadia Wildlands.

Contacts:        
Nick Cady, Cascadia Wildlands, (541) 434-1463
Quinn Read, Center for Biological Diversity
George Sexton, Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center
Susan Jane Brown, Western Environmental Law Center

Massive Logging Plan Threatens Coastal Martens, Marbled Murrelets

MEDFORD, Ore. — A coalition of Oregon conservation organizations notified the Bureau of Land Management today it intends to sue the agency to protect marbled murrelets and coastal martens from a plan by the agency to log thousands of acres of old-growth forest in areas designated as late-successional reserves. The reserves were designated as part of the Northwest Forest Plan to protect the two threatened species, as well as hundreds of others.

“The Bureau’s plans to remove thousands of acres of old-growth forests from late-successional reserves in southern Oregon is a death sentence for wildlife that are on the brink of extinction,” said Nick Cady, legal director for Cascadia Wildlands.

The Bureau’s “Integrated Vegetation Management Project” proposes using a wide array of activities, including commercial logging across 17,000 acres including mature and old-growth forest that would destroy habitat for threatened and endangered species.

“As a resident of southern Oregon who lives in a town that was decimated by the 2020 Almeda Fire, I am frustrated by the Bureau’s refusal to work with its neighbors,” said George Sexton, conservation director for KS Wild. “Instead of targeting backcountry wildlife reserves for timber production the Bureau should be working to thin timber plantations and protect homes and communities.”

The project covers a period of 10 years and would degrade tens of thousands of acres of public land. Although intended to promote more effective wildfire management practices, the project allows for the removal of larger diameter trees and the reduction of canopy cover — both of which make forests less resilient to fire.

“These agencies will find any excuse to cut down bigger and older trees, even if it means devastating Oregon’s beautiful wildlife reserves,” said Quinn Read, Oregon policy director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “This plan rubber-stamps the destruction of the marbled murrelets’ nesting habitat, and it’ll allow Oregon’s tiny population of coastal martens to be picked off one by one. It makes a mockery of our wildlife reserves as these species edge closer to extinction. We won’t stand by and watch this happen.”

“It is past time that the Biden administration and the Department of Interior deliver on the promises they have made to the public regarding the conservation of imperiled species,” said Susan Jane Brown, Wildlands and Wildlife Program director with the Western Environmental Law Center. “The BLM’s Integrated Vegetation Management Project is not based on the best available science and will push at-risk species past the brink of extinction. The BLM and Fish and Wildlife Service must change course now to protect treasured wildlife.”

###

The post Press Release: Legal Warning Challenges Plan to Log Thousands of Acres of Oregon’s Old-Growth Forest Reserves first appeared on Cascadia Wildlands.

Northwest Forest Plan science synthesis review begins

Will help inform forest management efforts in Pacific Northwest

The post Science Review Begins for Northwest Forest Plan Revision first appeared on Cascadia Wildlands.

Contacts: 
Susan Jane Brown, Western Environmental Law Center, 503-680-5513, brown@westernlaw.org
Todd True, Earthjustice, 206-343-7340, ext. 1030, ttrue@earthjustice.org
John Kober, Pacific Rivers, 503-915-6677, john@pacificrivers.org
Nick Cady, Cascadia Wildlands, 314-482-3746, nick@old.cascwild.org
Joseph Vaile, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, 541-488-5789, joseph@kswild.org
Doug Heiken, Oregon Wild, 541-344-0675, dh@oregonwild.org
Megan Birzell, The Wilderness Society, 206-348-3597, megan_birzell@tws.org

Stakeholder Groups Challenge Oregon Forest Management Plan

New Plan Sacrifices Clean Water, Fishing Economy, Carbon Storage, Recreational Opportunities

Eugene, Ore.— Late yesterday, a coalition of conservation and fishing groups challenged in the U.S. District Court in Oregon a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) forest management plan, finalized Friday, that would replace the scientifically sound, ecologically credible, and legally responsible 1994 Northwest Forest Plan on millions of acres in western Oregon. The new BLM plan, collectively known as the Resource Management Plans (RMPs) for Western Oregon, eliminates protections for streamside forests, increases clearcutting, and effectively removes 2.6 million acres of federally managed public forests from the requirements of the Northwest Forest Plan.

“BLM’s new plan would impact the quality of life of rural residents, drinking water quality, wildlife habitat, and carbon storage,” said Susan Jane Brown, staff attorney with the Western Environmental Law Center. “We need to get this right. We must protect special places that Oregonians love while we work to restore forests and watersheds. A holistic view should drive our public land decisions – not simply finding ways to maximize logging.”

Where the Northwest Forest Plan provided relative stability in Oregon’s often-contentious forest management, its elimination on these lands has sowed substantial discord. Last week, timber industry groups also challenged the new BLM plan in Washington, D.C. court, thousands of miles from those who will be most affected by the new plan.

The conservation and fishing stakeholders in yesterday’s challenge seek to maintain the protections of the Northwest Forest Plan and its science-based requirements, asserting that BLM’s new RMPs violate the Oregon and California Lands Act (O&C Act), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and therefore fail to support multiple uses of Oregon forests managed by the BLM.

“BLM’s new plan does a disservice to the years of great progress we’ve made in balancing timber, recreation, and conservation forest uses,” said Nick Cady of Cascadia wildlands. “We can’t allow the places we love and rely on to be put at risk by a bad plan. We can do so much better than this, and we must.”

The RMPs would increase logging levels by 37 percent, which could boost carbon emissions and make forests less resilient to climate change and other disturbances. In addition, the RMPs fail to recognize how healthy forests bring economic benefits to the state, such as Oregon’s $12.8 billion annual outdoor recreation industry, which supports 141,000 jobs and $955 million in state and local tax revenue.

Fishing organizations are highly concerned that the reduction in streamside forest protection could push imperiled species like salmon and steelhead further toward extinction. In southern Oregon, the BLM plan would remove the Applegate Adaptive Management Area that has enabled community members to play an active role in local land management decisions.

The BLM plan cuts corners scientifically and legally. It would cause significant harms to the plaintiff group, including:

• Eliminating the strong water quality and habitat provisions of the Northwest Forest Plan, reducing streamside no-logging buffers by half or more (a loss of 300,000 acres of streamside reserves). These reductions threaten wild native fish, water quality, terrestrial wildlife, and aquatic recreational opportunities.
• Introducing loopholes that would increase logging in older forest, termed late-successional reserves, and eliminate survey requirements for sensitive wildlife that depend on old forest habitat to thrive. In addition, the aforementioned 300,000 acres of riparian reserves, which had been intended to grow into old forest and bolster habitat for old forest species, is now fair game for logging.
• Disempowering public input and involvement by removing BLM and the plan from collaborative Adaptive Management Area efforts.
• Enacting the least ambitious carbon sequestration alternative analyzed. Over the next century, the status quo would sequester twice as much carbon.
• Focusing on more intensive, clearcut-style logging on nearly half a million acres of forests, abandoning the direction towards restoration of forests and watersheds under the Northwest Forest Plan.
• Designating additional recreation areas, in many of which logging and off-road motorized use take precedence and could diminish the types of quiet recreation the vast majority of Oregonians enjoy.

“We have been working with BLM for the last 15 years to develop restoration strategies for degraded forest lands. This has resulted in a successful program of thinning dense young forests to improve habitat, create jobs, and produce wood,” said Doug Heiken of Oregon Wild, “Now BLM is moving in the wrong direction by reducing protection for streamside forests and adopting new loopholes that put old-growth forests at risk.”

BLM first attempted to revise its resource management plans in 2008. That plan, the result of a sweetheart settlement between the Bush Administration and the timber industry, was withdrawn by the Obama Administration in 2009, resurrected by a federal judge in 2011 in response to a timber industry lawsuit, and finally rejected by a second federal judge in 2012.

A copy of the complaint is available here.

A copy of the Record of Decision for the BLM plan is available here.

A copy of the groups’ protest is available here.

###

The post New Western Oregon Forest Management Plan Challenged first appeared on Cascadia Wildlands.

On August 5, the Bureau of Land Management signed a new management plan for western Oregon.  Cascadia Wildlands and our conservation allies protested the initial draft of this plan, but the BLM's decision yesterday largely ignored all our points of contention.  

From a broad perspective, the plan will increase logging levels on federal BLM lands by 37 percent.  These public lands were originally designed to serve as a refuge and protective zone for imperiled forest species, clean water, carbon storage in an effort to counter-balance the industrial clearcutting and pesticide spraying occurring on intermixed private forest lands.  There is no question that this plan deeply compromises our landscape's ability to adapt to ongoing climate change and other disturbances like large-scale fires.  

For over the past 20 years, these public forests had been managed under the Northwest Forest Plan, a deal brokered by the Clinton administration to end the timber wars in Oregon. The Northwest Forest Plan was not perfect, but it strived to achieve balance and protect critical resources and generally took a precautionary approach to various unknowns.  

The BLM's new plan dramatically reduces almost every protection in the Northwest Forest Plan.  Specifically, the plan eliminates stream side buffers, eliminates surveys and buffers for imperiled or uncommon species, disregards climate change and carbon storage, and opens up mature and old-growth forest to archaic cleacrcutting practices. The plan completely ignores the contribution of these public lands to Oregon's booming outdoor industry which is valued at over 10 billion dollars a year.  The fishing industry is particularly worried given the potential impacts to Oregon's waterways.

These public forest are our homes, our playgrounds, our sanctuaries.  These efforts to strip our forests away from us will not stand.  Cascadia Wildlands is part of a broad coalition of conservation, recreation, and fishing groups in staunch opposition to this plan, and we are devoted to protecting these majestic lands. There will be news of our challenge soon.

The post BLM Signs Devastating New Management Plan for Oregon’s Forests! first appeared on Cascadia Wildlands.

Groups Protest Oregon Timber Plan Riddled With Loopholes

Latest BLM Plan Increases Clearcutting and Dismantles Streamside Forest Protections for Clean Water, Salmon, and Communities

The post Cascadia Wildlands and Conservation Allies Challenge BLM Forest Plans in Oregon first appeared on Cascadia Wildlands.

The post Bureau of Land Management: Four December Plan Revision Meetings Scheduled for Oregon first appeared on Cascadia Wildlands.