<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>resource sites - Cascadia Wildlands</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cascwild.org/tag/resource-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cascwild.org</link>
	<description>Defending and restoring Cascadia&#039;s wild ecosystems in the forests, in the courts, and on the streets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 22:45:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Oregon Board of Forestry Petitioned to Develop Coho Salmon Protections</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2019/oregon-board-of-forestry-petitioned-to-develop-coho-salmon-protections/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nsc425]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clearcut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ofpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon forest practices act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.old.cascwild.org/?p=18650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>April 24, 2019 — Today, twenty conservation and fishing organizations delivered a rulemaking petition to the Oregon Board of Forestry requesting new rules to prevent logging-related harm to “resource sites” for coho salmon listed under the state and federal Endangered Species Act. Coho salmon, which are split into three evolutionarily significant units in Oregon, were first listed in Southern Oregon in 1997, and soon thereafter along the rest of the Oregon Coast in 1998. The Lower Columbia coho population was listed almost over a decade ago, in 2005.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2019/oregon-board-of-forestry-petitioned-to-develop-coho-salmon-protections/">Oregon Board of Forestry Petitioned to Develop Coho Salmon Protections</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</strong><br />
April 24, 2019</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Twenty Oregon Fishing and Conservation Groups Petition for New Logging Rules to Protect Coho Salmon</strong></p>
<p>SALEM, OR – Today, twenty conservation and fishing organizations delivered a rulemaking petition to the Oregon Board of Forestry requesting new rules to prevent logging-related harm to “resource sites” for coho salmon listed under the state and federal Endangered Species Act. Coho salmon, which are split into three evolutionarily significant units in Oregon, were first listed in Southern Oregon in 1997, and soon thereafter along the rest of the Oregon Coast in 1998. The Lower Columbia coho population was listed almost over a decade ago, in 2005.</p>
<p>While coho salmon have been threatened with extinction for years, the Board of Forestry has never initiated a state-mandated review of its rules to protect the fish. “The Oregon Forest Practices Act clearly requires the Board of Forestry to address conflicts between logging and habitat for species at risk of extinction,” said Nick Cady, legal counsel with Cascadia Wild. “There are major ongoing conflicts between logging practices and coho salmon habitat that need to be resolved.”</p>
<p>Oregon has relied heavily on voluntary measures by timber companies to protect coho. Between 1995 and 2017, taxpayers invested $65 million dollars of public funds on instream habitat restoration efforts. However, Oregon’s weak forest practices rules still allow logging to degrade aquatic habitat critical to the recovery of coho salmon. Conrad Gowell, Fellowship Director with the Native Fish Society notes “We need to address the root causes of fish decline. The public’s investments in habitat restoration activities cannot keep up with the pace or scale of the ongoing degradation from poor forest practices.”</p>
<p>Oregon’s rules for state and private timberlands are the weakest in the Pacific Northwest. “Oregon has dragged its feet in addressing problems that have long been identified by state and federal expert agencies,” observed Mary Scurlock with the Oregon Stream Protection Coalition. “Intensive logging too close to streams and on landslide-prone areas, sediment from forest roads, and large areas dominated by clear-cuts and young plantations are perpetuating poor freshwater habitat conditions.”</p>
<p>“The Board has been taking a very slow and piecemeal approach to updating its policies,” said Robyn Janssen, “The last rule change took 15 years but still didn’t address some of the biggest problems for salmon and water quality – and left the Rogue Basin and its salmon out of the picture entirely. We can’t afford to wait another 20 years for Oregon to bring its logging rules up to snuff.”</p><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2019/oregon-board-of-forestry-petitioned-to-develop-coho-salmon-protections/">Oregon Board of Forestry Petitioned to Develop Coho Salmon Protections</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon Board of Forestry Reverses Course, Will Develop Murrelet Protections</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2016/oregon-board-of-forestry-reverses-course-will-develop-murrelet-protections/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nsc425]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 18:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign News Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clear cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marbled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murrelet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protect Public Forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protecting Forests and Wild Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threatened]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timber]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.old.cascwild.org/?p=15512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>December 1, 2016 — The Oregon Board of Forestry has reversed its prior decision to deny a petition from conservation groups that called for the identification and protection of marbled murrelet sites on state and private forest lands. The Board is now coordinating with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and other state land owning agencies to identify and protect important old-growth forest areas for the seabird threatened with extinction.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2016/oregon-board-of-forestry-reverses-course-will-develop-murrelet-protections/">Oregon Board of Forestry Reverses Course, Will Develop Murrelet Protections</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</strong><br />
December 1, 2016</p>
<p><strong>Contacts:</strong><br />
Nick Cady, <em>Cascadia Wildlands</em>, (314) 482-3746, nick@old.cascwild.org<br />
Noah Greenwald, <em>Center for Biological Diversity</em>, (503) 484-7495, ngreenwald@biologicaldiversity.org</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Oregon Board of Forestry Reverses Course, Will Develop Murrelet Protections</h3>
<h4 style="text-align: center;"><strong><em>Rulemaking Initiated to Protect Imperiled Seabird on State, Private Lands</em></strong></h4>
<p>EUGENE, Ore.— The Oregon Board of Forestry has reversed its prior decision to deny a petition from conservation groups that called for the identification and protection of marbled murrelet sites on state and private forest lands. The Board is now coordinating with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and other state land owning agencies to identify and protect important old-growth forest areas for the seabird threatened with extinction.</p>
<p>“It is reassuring to see the Board reverse course on this issue, especially given Oregon’s current efforts to sell off the Elliott State Forest,” said Nick Cady, legal director of Cascadia Wildlands. “The Elliott is a unique block of old-growth forest that is critical to the survival and recovery of this species, and should be the first area prioritized by the Board.”</p>
<p>Murrelets fly inland from the ocean to nest on wide, mossy limbs found in in the mature and old-growth forests of the Oregon Coast Range.  While most of Oregon’s coast range has been converted into industrial timberland that does not provide nesting habitat for the bird, the 93,000-acre Elliott State Forest, located in the coast range just east of Coos Bay, is a crucial block of older forest habitat and essential to the reproductive success of the species.</p>
<p>”The marbled murrelet is the only seabird in the world that nests in old-growth forests and needs our help to survive,” said Noah Greenwald, endangered species director with the Center for Biological Diversity. “I’m thrilled Oregon’s Board of Forestry is finally stepping up to provide protections to this imperiled bird and the forests it depends on.”</p>
<p>The petition to the Board of Forestry was filed Sept. 9th in conjunction with a petition to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife to uplist the species’ protection status from “threatened” to “endangered.” Given recent efforts by federal land managers to gut protections for the species and the substantial amount of habitat on state and private lands, the Department of Fish and Wildlife granted the petition, but the Board of Forestry denied its petition. After the Board’s denial, conservation groups filed a Petition for Review and asked the Board to reconsider its decision in light of requirements under Oregon law related to imperiled species.  The Board convened a special meeting on November 29, 2016 and stated it “withdraws and reverses its August 1, 2016 order denying the Petition for Rulemaking, accepts the Petition for Rulemaking, and immediately commences the rulemaking process.”</p>
<p>“Deforestation throughout the Coast Range have reduced habitat for marbled murrelets to just a few islands of old growth in a sea of clearcuts and monoculture tree plantations,” said Steve Pedery, conservation director for Oregon Wild. “Oregon is already decades overdue in developing a meaningful plan for conserving murrelet habitat. They cannot wait another 30 years.”</p>
<p>While murrelets have been listed as a ‘threatened’ species for nearly 30 years, Oregon has never developed a plan to recover them or protect the old-growth habitat that they depend on, and instead, the state has relied on the nesting habitat located on nearby federal forestlands. This is no longer sufficient as murrelet populations in the Pacific Northwest continue to decline, and a recent status review conducted by the US Fish and Wildlife Service determined that conservation of nesting habitat on state and private lands is now critical to the species’ survival.</p>
<p>The Petition to the Board of Forestry can be found <a href="https://www.old.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/BOF-Rulemaking-Petition-Marbled-Murrelet-6.20.16.pdf">here</a>.</p><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2016/oregon-board-of-forestry-reverses-course-will-develop-murrelet-protections/">Oregon Board of Forestry Reverses Course, Will Develop Murrelet Protections</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon Board of Forestry Sued for Failure to Protect Marbled Murrelet Habitat</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2016/oregon-board-of-forestry-sued-for-failure-to-protect-marbled-murrelet-habitat/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nsc425]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 17:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign News Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cascadia Wildlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Case: Marbled Murrelet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marbled murrelet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murrelet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protect Public Forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protecting Forests and Wild Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save the Elliott Rainforest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Oregon BLM Lands]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.old.cascwild.org/?p=15213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>September 30, 2016 — Four conservation organizations filed suit today against the Oregon Board of Forestry over dismissal of a petition requesting the Board identify and protect important old-growth forest areas for the marbled murrelet, a seabird threatened with extinction. Under Oregon law, the Board was supposed to have provided such protection after the seabird was protected as threatened under the state Endangered Species Act in 1987.  </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2016/oregon-board-of-forestry-sued-for-failure-to-protect-marbled-murrelet-habitat/">Oregon Board of Forestry Sued for Failure to Protect Marbled Murrelet Habitat</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</strong><br />
September 30, 2016</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Contact:</strong><br />
Nick Cady, <em>Cascadia Wildlands</em>, 314-482-3746, nick@old.cascwild.org<br />
Noah Greenwald, <em>Center for Biological Diversity</em>, 503-484-7495, ngreenwald@biologicaldiveristy.org<br />
Steve Pedery, <em>Oregon Wild</em>, 503-283-6343 ext. 212<br />
Bob Sallinger, <em>Portland Audubon</em>, 503-380-9728</div>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Lawsuit Filed Against Oregon Board of Forestry for Failing to Protect Habitat for Threatened Marbled Murrelet</h3>
<div></div>
<div><strong>EUGENE, Ore</strong>. — Four conservation organizations filed suit today against the Oregon Board of Forestry over dismissal of a petition requesting the Board identify and protect important old-growth forest areas for the marbled murrelet, a seabird threatened with extinction. Under Oregon law, the Board was supposed to have provided such protection after the seabird was protected as threatened under the state Endangered Species Act in 1987.</div>
<div></div>
<div>“The state of Oregon is obligated to protect its threatened wildlife, and it is not doing that with this unique seabird,” said <strong>Nick Cady, legal director at Cascadia Wildlands</strong>. “It is way past time that protection measures for the species are instituted, otherwise the marbled murrelet will go the way of the passenger pigeon.”</p>
<p>On Sept. 9 the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Commission granted a similar petition. The two agencies are required to work together to facilitate murrelet recovery and develop protection measures for occupied sites.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>The marbled murrelet was first listed as a threatened species in Oregon in 1987, and the listing of a species requires the Board of Forestry to conduct an inventory of species’ sites and develop rules to protect the sites from harmful forestry activities. Clearcut logging of the murrelets’ nesting habitat on state and private forestlands in Oregon is the primary cause of the species decline.</div>
<div></div>
<div>“For the last thirty years, Oregon’s plan for marbled murrelets has been to look the other way while their habitat is clear-cut,” said <strong>Steve Pedery, conservation director at Oregon Wild</strong>. “Oregonians expect better from our governor and state agencies. They need to develop a plan to protect murrelets and their habitat, and they need to stand up to pressure from the clearcut lobby and the county politicians who do their bidding.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>While murrelets have been listed as a ‘threatened’ species for nearly 30 years, Oregon has never developed a plan to recover them or protect the old-growth habitat that they depend on. Instead the state has relied on the nesting habitat located on nearby federal forestlands. This is no longer sufficient as murrelet populations in the Pacific Northwest continue to decline, and a recent status review conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service determined that conservation of nesting habitat on state and private lands is now critical to the species’ survival.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The Board of Forestry&#8217;s decision to not even consider a petition to identify and protect old growth habitat for Marbled Murrelets once again demonstrates the board&#8217;s indifference towards the plight of Marbled Murrelets and other old growth dependents species,&#8221; said <strong>Bob Sallinger, Conservation Director for Audubon Society of Portland</strong>. &#8220;The Board has been ignoring its obligations under both state and federal law for decades even as the Marbled Murrelets numbers continue to plummet.&#8221;</div>
<div></div>
<div>Murrelets fly inland from the ocean to nest on wide, mossy limbs found in the mature and old-growth forests of the Oregon Coast Range. A recent decision to ramp up clearcut logging of murrelet nesting habitat on Bureau of Land Management lands in western Oregon coupled with the state of Oregon’s proposal to privatize the 93,000-acre Elliott State Forest located, east of Coos Bay, underscore the need to develop habitat protections. A recent murrelet monitoring report produced by the U.S. Forest Service stressed the urgent need to “arrest the loss of suitable habitat on all lands, especially on non-federal lands in the relatively near term.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>“The Board of Forestry&#8217;s management of the old-growth forests needed by the marbled murrelet and cherished by Oregonians across the political spectrum has been abysmal,” said <strong>Noah Greenwald, endangered species director at the Center for Biological Diversity</strong>. “The Board of Forestry and Gov. Kate Brown have a legal and moral responsibility to protect murrelets and their forest habitat, and need to take action to reverse the decline of the species.&#8221;</div>
<h5>Background:</h5>
<div>The marbled murrelet is a member of the auk family, which includes birds like auklets, guillemots and puffins. These sea-birds get their name from the marbling pattern of black, gray and white that covers their backs during the non-breeding season. When murrelets are breeding they molt to a plain brown plumage. They form lifelong breeding pairs and feed on small, schooling fish, such as herring.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Populations of marbled murrelets are closely tied to the amount of old forest habitat available for nesting. The central Oregon Coast is one of the last strongholds for murrelets. While forest practices have changed on federal lands managed by the Siuslaw National Forest, scientists warn that more needs to be done to protect murrelet habitat on state and private lands where logging practices continue to indiscriminately remove nesting habitat.</div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">####</div><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2016/oregon-board-of-forestry-sued-for-failure-to-protect-marbled-murrelet-habitat/">Oregon Board of Forestry Sued for Failure to Protect Marbled Murrelet Habitat</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: cascwild.org @ 2026-08-24 03:56:56 by W3 Total Cache
-->