<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>suction dredging - Cascadia Wildlands</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cascwild.org/tag/suction-dredging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cascwild.org</link>
	<description>Defending and restoring Cascadia&#039;s wild ecosystems in the forests, in the courts, and on the streets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 23:35:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Lawsuit Launched to Protect Washington Rivers, Salmon from Destructive Suction Dredge Mining</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2017/lawsuit-launched-to-protect-washington-rivers-salmon-from-destructive-suction-dredge-mining/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cascadia Wildlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabe Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Our Wild Salmon Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steelhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wild salmon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.old.cascwild.org/?p=15611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>January 10, 2017 — Conservation groups filed a notice of intent today to sue the state of Washington for allowing highly destructive suction dredge mining in rivers and streams critical to endangered salmon and steelhead. The Washington Department of Wildlife approves the harmful recreational gold-mining technique in rivers throughout the state that are home to numerous imperiled fish species. Conservation and fisheries groups have also introduced bills in the state legislature to better monitor and regulate suction dredge mining.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2017/lawsuit-launched-to-protect-washington-rivers-salmon-from-destructive-suction-dredge-mining/">Lawsuit Launched to Protect Washington Rivers, Salmon from Destructive Suction Dredge Mining</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><em><b>Harmful Gold-mining Method Already Restricted in California, Oregon</b></em></p>
<div>
<div><strong>For Immediate Release</strong><br />
January 10, 2017</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Contact:</strong></div>
<div>Gabriel Scott, Cascadia Wildlands (541) 434-1463 gscott@old.cascwild.org</div>
<div>Jonathan Evans, Center for Biological Diversity, (510) 844-7118, jevans@biologicaldiversity.org</div>
<div></div>
<div>OLYMPIA, <em>Wash.</em>— Conservation groups filed a <a href="https://www.old.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2017-1-10_Suction_Dredge_ESA_CWA_Notice_Letter.pdf">notice</a> of intent today to sue the state of Washington for allowing highly destructive suction dredge mining in rivers and streams critical to endangered salmon and steelhead. The Washington Department of Wildlife approves the harmful recreational gold-mining technique in rivers throughout the state that are home to numerous imperiled fish species. Conservation and fisheries groups have also introduced bills in the state legislature to better monitor and regulate suction dredge mining.</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>“Suction dredge mining pollutes our waterways with toxic mercury, clouds streams with sediment, kills endangered fish and destroys irreplaceable cultural resources that are important to all Washingtonians,” said Jonathan Evans, environmental health legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “This is a dirty, outdated form of mining that our families, waterways and wildlife shouldn’t be subjected to.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>Suction dredge mining uses large, gas-powered vacuums to suck up gravel on the bottom of rivers and streams in search of gold flakes. Miners target gravel beds critical to salmon spawning and reproduction and pollute waterways with sediment and toxic mercury and heavy metals in their search for gold. Suction dredge mining also threatens important cultural resources important to American Indians.</div>
<div></div>
<div>“Suction dredge miners are killing endangered salmon and polluting our waterways and it needs to stop,” said Gabriel Scott, in-house counsel for Cascadia Wildlands. “We intend to enforce the law ourselves if the state won’t.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>The harm done by suction dredging is well documented by scientists and government agencies. In recent years Oregon and California have halted suction dredge mining for gold in areas that are important for rivers and fisheries because of its damage to water quality and wildlife. In Idaho the EPA has stepped in to regulate the practice. Today’s notice, filed by the Center and Cascadia Wildlands, notifies Washington’s Department of Fish and Wildlife and Department of Ecology of ongoing violations of the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act.</div>
<div></div>
<div>While the state doesn’t track individual mining locations, the majority of Washington’s rivers and streams are open to mining. Because the state of Washington has never squared state laws regulating suction dredge mining with the Endangered Species Act or Clean Water Act, two bills were introduced in the state legislature this week to better monitor and regulate the activity. House Bill 1077, introduced by Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon (D-Seattle), would create important safeguards in environmentally sensitive areas to protect salmon and water quality. House Bill 1106, introduced by Rep. Gael Tarleton (D-Seattle), would require miners to comply with the Clean Water Act to reduce pollution when mining.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Numerous other commercial and recreational organizations have raised concerns that suction dredge and other motorized mining practices are disruptive and harmful to fishing. Statewide, commercial fisheries generate more than $1.6 billion annually and sport fishing generates more than $1.1 billion annually. Suction dredge mining also undermines the tens of millions of dollars invested in salmon recovery efforts in Washington.</div>
<div></div>
<div>For detailed mapping of rivers and streams with suction dredge mining or endangered fish habitat click <a href="http://center.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Viewer/index.html?appid=88810c97ccd344b3ac12743f561eacef" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>.</div><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2017/lawsuit-launched-to-protect-washington-rivers-salmon-from-destructive-suction-dredge-mining/">Lawsuit Launched to Protect Washington Rivers, Salmon from Destructive Suction Dredge Mining</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cascadia Wildlands Joins Lawsuit to Protect Wild Salmon and Clean Water from Gold Mining</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2015/cascadia-wildlands-joins-lawsuit-to-protect-wild-salmon-and-clean-water-from-gold-mining/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nsc425]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 23:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Our Wild Salmon Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredge mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wild salmon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.old.cascwild.org/?p=14581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>November 20, 2015 — To defend an Oregon law designed to protect wildlife from damaging gold mining along waterways, a broad coalition of groups moved to intervene today in a lawsuit by mining interests challenging the restrictions. Passed by the Oregon Legislature in 2013, Senate Bill 838 placed restrictions on gold mining using suction dredges and other motorized equipment along streams to prevent harmful impacts to salmon and develop a permitting process to better protect Oregon’s waterways. Miners are now alleging that the state law conflicts with federal laws passed in the 1800s to encourage westward expansion.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2015/cascadia-wildlands-joins-lawsuit-to-protect-wild-salmon-and-clean-water-from-gold-mining/">Cascadia Wildlands Joins Lawsuit to Protect Wild Salmon and Clean Water from Gold Mining</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</strong><br />
November 20, 2015</p>
<p><strong>Contacts:</strong><br />
Forrest English, <em>Rogue Riverkeeper</em>, (541) 261-2030<br />
Nick Cady, <em>Cascadia Wildlands</em>, (314) 482-3746<br />
Jonathan Evans, <em>Center for Biological Diversity</em>, (510) 844-7118<br />
Glen Spain, <em>PCFFA</em>, (541) 689-2000</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Conservation, Fishing Groups Move to Join Lawsuit to Protect Oregon From Gold Mining Impacts</h3>
<h4 style="text-align: center;"><em><strong>Groups Defend Restrictions on Mining Practices Harmful to Salmon, Waterways, Wildlife</strong></em></h4>
<p>MEDFORD, Ore.— To defend an Oregon law designed to protect wildlife from damaging gold mining along waterways, a broad coalition of groups moved to intervene today in a lawsuit by mining interests challenging the restrictions. Passed by the Oregon Legislature in 2013, Senate Bill 838 placed restrictions on gold mining using suction dredges and other motorized equipment along streams to prevent harmful impacts to salmon and develop a permitting process to better protect Oregon’s waterways. Miners are now alleging that the state law conflicts with federal laws passed in the 1800s to encourage westward expansion.</p>
<p>“We are defending the state of Oregon and the choice by its residents to protect iconic waterways and scenic rivers from damaging mining practices,” said Nick Cady, legal director of Cascadia Wildlands. “Asserting there is a ‘right to mine’ granted by an antiquated law from the 1800s is simply ridiculous.”</p>
<p>Suction dredge mining involves the use of a large, gas-powered vacuum to suck up gravel on the bottom of rivers in search of gold flakes. This practice targets gravel beds critical to salmon spawning and reproduction, and damages water quality and river hydrology. Motorized mining along streams clears riparian vegetation important for keeping streams cool for salmon survival, increases erosion, damages streamside wetlands and alters the floodplain.</p>
<p>“Suction dredge mining pollutes our waterways with toxic mercury, clouds streams with sediment, hurts endangered fish and wildlife and destroys cultural resources,” said Jonathan Evans, environmental health legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Oregonians have the right to safeguard the health of their families, waterways and wildlife from this damaging, outdated form of mining.”</p>
<p>The bill does not ban the mining practices, but simply puts in place temporary restrictions to protect areas critical to salmon and bull trout reproduction. The restrictions buy the state time to develop a regulatory regime for the relatively new mining practice.</p>
<p>“Motorized mining in and along our sensitive salmon streams is harmful to fish and water quality,” said Forrest English with Rogue Riverkeeper. “It’s high time to put the brakes on these methods of mining until long term solutions are developed that protect clean water and habitat for salmon.”</p>
<p>Concerns over this mining practice were heightened when miners began targeting iconic and high-use Oregon waterways and their tributaries.</p>
<p>“Several south coast salmon-rich rivers are under threat from heavy suction-dredge mining every summer, especially the world-famous Rogue River, the Chetco River and their tributaries,” said Cameron La Follette with Oregon Coast Alliance. “The salmon economy is critically important to local communities on the south coast such as Brookings and Gold Beach. Oregon must restrict suction dredging to protect salmon habitat, water quality and community livelihood.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are also concerns by numerous commercial and recreational organizations that suction dredge and other motorized mining practices are disruptive and harmful to fishing, an industry that generates approximately $780 million a year in spending in Oregon.</p>
<p>“Letting a handful of people suck up whole river bottoms looking for flecks of gold makes no economic sense, since it destroys salmon habitat and just puts more commercial fishing families out of work,” said <strong>Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations</strong>, a major commercial fishing industry association that is also intervening. “Senate Bill 838’s passage by the legislature simply recognized that it is not a good idea for the state of Oregon to continue to use taxpayer money to heavily subsidize the destruction of our rivers.”</p>
<p>The groups are also looking to protect the public’s investment in salmon restoration. Hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars have been expended to restore streams damaged by past mining and industrial practices. The use of suction dredges and motorized mining equipment has been undoing many of these efforts.</p>
<p>“Allowing gas-powered dredges and heavy equipment to damage our delicate salmon streams directly undermines the $254 million investment Oregonians have made in salmon habitat restoration,” said <strong>Mark Sherwood with the Native Fish Society</strong>. “Oregonians and wild salmon deserve better.”</p>
<p>The intervening organizations include Rogue Riverkeeper, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations and Institute for Fisheries, the Center for Biological Diversity, Oregon Coast Alliance, Native Fish Society and Cascadia Wildlands. They are represented by Pete Frost of the Western Environmental Law Center and Roger Flynn of Western Mining Action Project.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">###</p><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2015/cascadia-wildlands-joins-lawsuit-to-protect-wild-salmon-and-clean-water-from-gold-mining/">Cascadia Wildlands Joins Lawsuit to Protect Wild Salmon and Clean Water from Gold Mining</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor Signs Bill to Protect Salmon Habitat by Reducing Impacts of Suction Dredge Gold Mining on Oregon Rivers</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2013/governor-signs-bill-to-protect-salmon-habitat-bill-to-reduce-impacts-of-suction-dredge-gold-mining-on-oregon-rivers/</link>
					<comments>https://cascwild.org/2013/governor-signs-bill-to-protect-salmon-habitat-bill-to-reduce-impacts-of-suction-dredge-gold-mining-on-oregon-rivers/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.old.cascwild.org/?p=8467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>August 15, 2013 — Anglers, landowners, outdoor recreation businesses, and river advocates celebrated yesterday as Governor John Kitzhaber signed Senate Bill 838 (SB 838). The bill takes steps to protect salmon habitat throughout Oregon through reasonable reductions in levels of harmful suction dredge gold mining.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/governor-signs-bill-to-protect-salmon-habitat-bill-to-reduce-impacts-of-suction-dredge-gold-mining-on-oregon-rivers/">Governor Signs Bill to Protect Salmon Habitat by Reducing Impacts of Suction Dredge Gold Mining on Oregon Rivers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>For immediate release</strong><a href="https://www.old.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/MendoAu-dredge.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8468" src="https://www.old.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/MendoAu-dredge-300x225.jpg" alt="MendoAu dredge" width="300" height="225" /></a><br />
August 15, 2013</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Contact</strong></div>
<div>Forrest English, Rogue Riverkeeper, 541-261-2030</div>
<div>Josh Laughlin, Cascadia Wildlands, 541-844-8182</div>
<div>Erik Fernandez, Oregon Wild, 503-283-6343 x202</div>
<div>Jim McCarthy, WaterWatch of Oregon, 541-708-0731</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong style="line-height: 1.6em;">Governor Signs Bill to Protect Salmon Habitat</strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Bill to Reduce Impacts of Suction Dredge Gold Mining on Oregon Rivers</div>
<div></div>
<div>Salem, OR — Anglers, landowners, outdoor recreation businesses, and river advocates celebrated yesterday as Governor John Kitzhaber signed Senate Bill 838 (SB 838). The bill takes steps to protect salmon habitat throughout Oregon through reasonable reductions in levels of harmful suction dredge gold mining.</div>
<div></div>
<div>“Salmon and clean water are some of the defining characteristics for Oregon’s streams and rivers,” said John Ward of Rogue Flyfishers. “This bill is a first step to ensure their protection as most Oregonian’s desire.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>The signed bill is a compromise with three main sections to be implemented over the next three years. The first part starting in 2014 will bring the maximum numbers of permits down to 850 statewide – the number of permits issued in Oregon before California banned this type of mining, driving a large increase of out of state miners to Oregon rivers.  The legislation gives preference to long-time Oregon miners and makes lonely minor changes to current dredging regulations.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The second portion of the bill directs the Governor’s office to lead state agencies in the development of  a new comprehensive regulatory framework for the legislature’s approval in 2015. This framework would be designed to meet reasonable protections for threatened and endangered salmon and trout, while simplifying Oregon’s currently complex permitting process for this suction dredging.</div>
<div></div>
<div>“There will be over two years of public process to ensure that these new regulations are well thought out, scientifically based and effective,” said Josh Laughlin of Cascadia Wildlands. “This is a fair and balanced process that will benefit clean water and salmon into the future.”</div>
<div></div>
<div>The third and final part of the bill—a 5 year moratorium on suction dredging in salmon habitat—will go into effect only if the legislature fails to act in 2015 by adopting the Governor’s new regulations.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&#8220;While this bill doesn&#8217;t solve the problem it&#8217;s an important first step in better protecting Oregon&#8217;s drinking water sources from mining pollution,” said Erik Fernandez of Oregon Wild.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Suction dredge mining in waterways involves the use of gasoline-powered vacuums, mounted on floating rafts, which suck up the riverbed in search of gold. Scientific studies have demonstrated that the practice harms spawning habitat, invertebrate and bivalve communities that feed fish, and stirs up toxic mercury. There has been a spike in suction dredge mining in Oregon since California enacted a moratorium on the practice in 2009 due to its impacts on water quality and fish populations. Between 2005-2012, there was a 580% increase in suction dredge mining in Oregon, more than quadrupling from 414 to 2,409 permits issued. The increasing number of suction dredgers has introduced new conflicts with other river users and landowners.</div>
<div></div>
<div>&#8220;In response to this growing threat to Oregon&#8217;s iconic rivers and streams, a broad coalition of fishermen, conservationists, outfitters, and other river enthusiasts asked the legislature this year to take reasonable, science-based steps to protect these invaluable resources,&#8221; said Jim McCarthy, WaterWatch of Oregon&#8217;s Southern Oregon Program Manager. &#8220;We commend our legislative leaders and the Governor for taking this first step toward better protection of our state&#8217;s rivers and salmon runs.&#8221;</div>
<div></div>
<div>Science played a major role in the construction and passage of SB 838. In California, state agencies conducted an exhaustive evaluation of the scientific literature, and concluded that the only way to prevent the negative water quality and health impacts of suction dredging is to prohibit the activity altogether. In early April, the Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society sent a letter to Oregon legislators outlining the myriad impacts suction dredging has on fish. One of the letter’s recommendations was to prohibit or greatly reduce suction dredge mining in areas used for spawning by sensitive fish stocks. This followed a similar letter issued by the Western Division of the American Fisheries Society prior to the California moratorium.</div>
<div></div>
<div>“Studies have shown that suction dredging can mobilize toxic mercury, and reduce the spawning success of salmon species,” said Forrest English of Rogue Riverkeeper. “This bill ensures Oregon will better evaluate the available science and ensure that water quality and our iconic fish species are protected into the future.”</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">                                                                                           ####</div><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/governor-signs-bill-to-protect-salmon-habitat-bill-to-reduce-impacts-of-suction-dredge-gold-mining-on-oregon-rivers/">Governor Signs Bill to Protect Salmon Habitat by Reducing Impacts of Suction Dredge Gold Mining on Oregon Rivers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cascwild.org/2013/governor-signs-bill-to-protect-salmon-habitat-bill-to-reduce-impacts-of-suction-dredge-gold-mining-on-oregon-rivers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fantastic Fourth Float</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2013/fantastic-fourth-float/</link>
					<comments>https://cascwild.org/2013/fantastic-fourth-float/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nsc425]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cascadia Wildlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploring Cascadia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[float trip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Cady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[willamette]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cascwild.org/?p=8109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>To celebrate the recent passage of the suction dredging bill and in an effort to remove myself from the computer, a friend of mine Kyle who works for a local watershed council and I decided to paddle down the Willamette River from Eugene to Independence Oregon, just south of Salem.&#160; Growing up paddling in the ... <a title="Fantastic Fourth Float" class="read-more" href="https://cascwild.org/2013/fantastic-fourth-float/" aria-label="Read more about Fantastic Fourth Float">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/fantastic-fourth-float/">Fantastic Fourth Float</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To celebrate the recent passage of the suction dredging bill and in an effort to remove myself from the computer, a friend of mine Kyle who works for a local watershed council and I decided to paddle down the Willamette River from Eugene to Independence Oregon, just south of Salem.&nbsp; Growing up paddling in the Ozarks, I had been missing these types of excursions, and jumped at the chance to camp on gravel bars for a few nights.&nbsp; We took advantage of some days off for the Fourth of July weekend and borrowed a Wenonah Spirit (17 foot all-purpose canoe).&nbsp; We planned for three nights of meals and four days on the river and after realizing we forgot a stove, resolved to cook over fires. &nbsp;</p>
<p><img decoding="async" alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8110" height="224" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Willameete-loaded-boat-shot-300x224.jpg" title="Willameete loaded boat shot" width="300" /></p>
<p>We put in at Armitage State Park in Springfield, actually on the McKenzie River, only a couple of miles from the confluence with the Willamette.&nbsp; I was hoping we would get to shoot the roller under Autzen Bridge on the way through Alton Baker Park, but I realized later that my friend had purposely avoided this route, likely in an effort to preserve his expensive fly-fishing gear that was brought along. &nbsp;</p>
<p>This first stretch of the river contained a fair deal of fast water, and some narrow turns, the first of which almost spilled us as I turned the bow a little too soon and caught an eddy current that put the edge of the boat on the water line, and turned us 280 degrees.&nbsp; The Willamette took some time for me to adjust too, the sheer quantity of water forces you to prepare your turns much earlier, and I eventually learned to prepare my line far before a large strainer was upon us.</p>
<p>We entirely spaced the confluence between the McKenzie and the Willamette, but apparently it is not that significant.&nbsp;&nbsp; It consisted of at least two separate smaller streams feeding into the main channel of the McKenzie, but shortly after realizing we had missed the confluence, we noticed that the river had gotten much larger. &nbsp;</p>
<p>The first night we camped about ten miles south of Corvallis, west of Brownsville.&nbsp; We had found an excellent large gravel bar on a secluded stretch of the river, figured it was around 5 or 6 (we put in at 11am), and gathered plentiful drift wood for a nice fire to clear any bugs and prepare dinner.&nbsp; It was the fourth and we were camped at a bend in the river allowing us to see up at least a couples of miles of straight river that pointed to Corvallis.&nbsp; After a horrible dinner of mac and cheese and hot dogs (&lsquo;merica) that settled like an enormous stone in our stomachs and set the stage for emergency pull-overs the next day, we played some cribbage and luckily we able to catch the majority of the firework show in Corvallis that was above the tree line.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8111" height="200" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Willamette-fourth-dinner-300x200.jpg" title="Willamette fourth dinner" width="300" /></p>
<p>We had plenty of wood leftover for coffee and bacon in the morning (make sure to bring some sort of work gloves when cooking over open flames) and got on the water relatively early in an effort to catch some wildlife.&nbsp; The river has slowed a fair deal, which allowed Kyle to fish from the bow, although apparently the fishing is not very good that far north.&nbsp; We stumbled upon a lot of blue herons, bald eagles, kingfishers, the occasional deer, and frequently spotted fish swimming alongside the boat.&nbsp; This early stretch of the river was filled with beautiful large gravel bars, plenty of nice camping spots, and good looking river banks. &nbsp;</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8112" height="200" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Willamette-bacon-300x200.jpg" title="Willamette bacon" width="300" /></p>
<p>We soon passed through Peoria and Corvallis, where the Willamette is joined by the Marys River.&nbsp; We were joined on the river by some partying college students that were enjoying the sun.&nbsp; After Corvallis we also noticed a couple of motor boats on the water; we were passed by a large police boat that despite our efforts decided to corner the flotilla of OSU kids.&nbsp; Aside of the riverside parks after the confluence with the Calapooia (Kyle&rsquo;s watershed council), the river began to take on a totally different look.&nbsp; Very agricultural, prominent erosion on the banks and every once in a while, a large piece of rusting farm equipment half submerged.&nbsp; The water had slowed dramatically; we figured we were covering around 2 miles an hour with slight paddling.&nbsp; Camping opportunities, aside from crowded boat ramp parks, became scarce in this section as well.&nbsp; As the day wore on, we became slightly worried about finding a decent gravel bar to post-up on.&nbsp; We decided to push through Albany, and attempt to hit a two-mile long island that we were confident&nbsp; would have some camping. &nbsp;</p>
<p>We were not making good time and as the sun started to approach the tree-line, we started paddling hard in an effort to find this ominously self-titled island.&nbsp; We reached the island as the sun was setting.&nbsp; We beached the boat at the tip of the island, and hiked around briefly to decide where to camp.&nbsp; There was a great spot, although boggy, on the east side of the island, which also shielded us from the noise of the road on the far west bank of the river.&nbsp; We quickly gathered some wood, and started a smoky fire to keep away the bugs we knew the frequent pools were sheltering , and given the hard paddling for the past few hours, elected to cook our ribeyes and twice baked potatoes that I had prepared and wrapped in foil days before.&nbsp; Kyle retied early, but I decided to prop myself up in two camping chairs and weather the night next to the fire.&nbsp; The north portion of the island had a large stand of cottonwoods and firs, that as I soon realized, harbored an enormous bat population.&nbsp; Watching the stars, I felt like I was looking through a screen door there were some many bats preying on the bugs those pools were producing.&nbsp; There was also a beaver nearby that I heard throughout the night, who was also evidenced by the nice chewed on hardwood sticks I was using to fuel the fire.&nbsp; In the morning we prepared coffee and bagel and sausage sandwiches.&nbsp; After a morning swim, we were able to load the canoe quickly and hit the water.&nbsp;</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8113" height="300" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Willamette-coffee-300x300.jpg" title="Willamette coffee" width="300" /></p>
<p>Just several miles north of our camp spot we hit the confluence of the Santiam River, which was marked by an enormous and awesome gravel bar.&nbsp; This stretch of the river altered dramatically as well.&nbsp; The agricultural traces began to fade and we began to come across large bluffs and gravel bars.&nbsp; Having made good time the following day, we stopped and enjoyed the sun for a bit and got in some more fishing.&nbsp; We also took a lot of time to fish the frequent sloughs along the river.&nbsp; These sloughs were sluggish, frequently dead-ending, side-channels of the river.&nbsp; Kyle was sight fishing for carp, looking for murky disturbances in the water (sign of feeding), attempting to spot the three feet fish scared out by our shadow, and then dropping the line right in front of the fish in hopes it would take hold.&nbsp; We had several good opportunities, but never landed one.&nbsp; It was incredible to see these huge fish, in these very shallow and isolated back channels, where they spend their entire lives. &nbsp;</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8114" height="224" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Will-Slough-300x224.jpg" title="Will Slough" width="300" /></p>
<p>Despite resting the majority of the day on improvised dry-bag back rests, we still arrived at our take out in Independence that third night, where there was no camping allowed.&nbsp; We had totaled around 90 miles in three days, likely averaging around 3-4 miles per hour.&nbsp; There is a big fourth celebration in Independence, Oregon (given the name) on that Saturday night and allow tempted to stay and experience the town, we decided to load up the car and head back into Eugene for the evening.&nbsp; All in all it was an incredible trip and novel way to spend a holiday.&nbsp; I was amazed by the resilience of this heavily abused river that has been able to recover quickly and still provide an easy escape from town.&nbsp; What&rsquo;s the saying: &ldquo;Nature bats last.&rdquo;</p><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/fantastic-fourth-float/">Fantastic Fourth Float</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cascwild.org/2013/fantastic-fourth-float/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press Release: Bill to Protect Salmon Habitat in Oregon Passes House and Senate, Awaits Governor&#8217;s Signature</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2013/press-release-bill-to-protect-salmon-habitat-in-oregon-passes-house-and-senate-awaits-governors-signature/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign News Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cascadia Wildlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moratorium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protecting Forests and Wild Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Our Wild Salmon Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 838]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.old.cascwild.org/?p=7949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>July 8, 2013 — Celebrated by fishermen, landowners, outdoor recreation businesses, and river advocates, Senate Bill 838 (SB 838) has just been passed by the Oregon House and Senate. SB 838 is now on the Governor’s desk awaiting only a signature to become law. The bill takes steps to protect salmon habitat throughout<br />
Oregon through reasonable reductions in levels of suction dredge gold mining.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/press-release-bill-to-protect-salmon-habitat-in-oregon-passes-house-and-senate-awaits-governors-signature/">Press Release: Bill to Protect Salmon Habitat in Oregon Passes House and Senate, Awaits Governor’s Signature</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For immediate release</strong><br />
July 8, 2013</p>
<p><strong>Contact:</strong><br />
Forrest English, Rogue Riverkeeper, 541-261-2030<br />
Josh Laughlin, Cascadia Wildlands, 541-844-8182</p>
<p>Salem, OR — Celebrated by fishermen, landowners, outdoor recreation businesses, and river advocates, Senate Bill 838 (SB 838) has just been passed by the Oregon House and Senate. SB 838 is now on the Governor’s desk awaiting only a signature to become law. The bill takes steps to protect salmon habitat throughout <a href="https://www.old.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/chinook-NOAA2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-7960" title="chinook-NOAA" src="https://www.old.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/chinook-NOAA2-300x174.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="174" /></a>Oregon through reasonable reductions in levels of suction dredge gold mining.</p>
<p>“Salmon and clean water are some of the defining characteristics for Oregon’s streams and rivers,” said John Ward of Rogue Flyfishers. “This bill is a balanced first step to ensure their protection as most Oregonian’s desire.”</p>
<p>Although the original bill called for a total statewide moratorium, the final bill is a compromise with three main sections to be implemented over the next 3 years. The first part starting in 2014 will bring the maximum numbers of permits down to 850 statewide – levels not seen since 2009 – giving preference to long-time Oregon miners and making little change to current dredging regulations.</p>
<p>The second portion of the bill directs the Governor’s office to lead agency and public participation in proposing a new comprehensive regulatory framework for the legislature’s approval in 2015. This framework would be designed to meet reasonable protections for threatened and endangered salmon and trout, while simplifying Oregon’s currently complex permitting process for this activity.</p>
<p>“There will be over 2 years of public process to ensure that these new regulations are well thought out, scientifically based and effective,” said Josh Laughlin of Cascadia Wildlands. “This is a fair and balanced process that will benefit clean water and salmon into the future.”</p>
<p>The third and final part of the bill—a 5 year moratorium on suction dredging in salmon habitat—will go into effect only if the legislature fails to act in 2015 by adopting the Governor’s new regulations.</p>
<p>“Should the Governor and legislature act in a timely manner, miners will continue to be able to use this mining technique in appropriate areas away from endangered salmon without interruption,” said Forrest English of Rogue Riverkeeper. “Only as a last resort would this legislation enact a temporary moratorium in endangered salmon habitat.”</p>
<p>Suction dredge mining in waterways involves the use of gasoline-powered vacuums, mounted on floating rafts, which suck up the riverbed in search of gold. Scientific studies have demonstrated that the practice harms spawning habitat, invertebrate and bivalve communities that feed fish, and stirs up toxic mercury. There has been a spike in suction dredge mining in Oregon since California enacted a moratorium on the practice in 2009 due to its impacts on water quality and fish populations. Between 2005-2012, there was a 580% increase in suction dredge mining in Oregon, more than quadrupling from 414 to 2,409 permits issued. The increasing number of suction dredgers has introduced new conflicts with other river users and landowners.</p>
<p>Science played a major role in the construction and passage of SB 838. In California, state agencies conducted an exhaustive evaluation of the scientific literature, and concluded that the only way to prevent the negative water quality and health impacts of suction dredging is to prohibit the activity altogether. In early April, the Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society sent a letter to Oregon legislators outlining the myriad impacts suction dredging has on fish. One of the letter’s recommendations was to prohibit or greatly reduce suction dredge mining in areas used for spawning by sensitive fish stocks. This followed a similar letter issued by the Western Division of the American Fisheries Society prior to the California moratorium.</p>
<p>“Studies have shown that suction dredging can mobilize toxic mercury, and reduce the spawning success of salmon species,” added English. “This bill ensures Oregon will better evaluate the available science and ensure that water quality and our iconic fish species are protected into the future.”</p>
<p>####</p><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/press-release-bill-to-protect-salmon-habitat-in-oregon-passes-house-and-senate-awaits-governors-signature/">Press Release: Bill to Protect Salmon Habitat in Oregon Passes House and Senate, Awaits Governor’s Signature</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FONSI not Fonzie</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2013/fonsi-not-fonzie/</link>
					<comments>https://cascwild.org/2013/fonsi-not-fonzie/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Our Wild Salmon Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cascwild.org/?p=6927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; By Bob Ferris &#160; &#34;&#8230;not once during the many hours of public testimony was the committee presented with scientific evidence that the practice of small-scale suction dredge mining is damaging to fish populations or the environment.&#34; Oregon State Senator Olsen in an op-ed in Oregon Business&#160; &#160; During the recent hearing on suction dredging ... <a title="FONSI not Fonzie" class="read-more" href="https://cascwild.org/2013/fonsi-not-fonzie/" aria-label="Read more about FONSI not Fonzie">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/fonsi-not-fonzie/">FONSI not Fonzie</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<div>By Bob Ferris</div>
<p><a href="https://www.cascwild.org/fonsi-not-fonzie/mendoau-ripping-up-bank-4/" rel="attachment wp-att-6942"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" class="alignright size-large wp-image-6942" height="200" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/mendoAu-ripping-up-bank3-266x200.jpg" title="mendoAu ripping up bank" width="266" /></a></p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">&quot;&hellip;not once during the many hours of public testimony was the committee presented with scientific evidence that the practice of small-scale suction dredge mining is damaging to fish populations or the environment.&quot; <a href="http://www.oregonbusiness.com/blogs/124-opinion/9909-oregon-mining-senator-alan-olsen">Oregon State Senator Olsen in an op-ed in Oregon Business&nbsp;</a></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>During the recent hearing on suction dredging in Salem&mdash;where I counted no fewer than four scientists presenting evidence of fish and environmental impacts&mdash;much was made about this issue of the California analyses that produced several conditional Findings of No Significant Impact&#8211;FONSIs in agency speak sounding just like the leather jacketed icon of Happy Days&rsquo; fame. &nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Unfortunately, in the rationalization, distillation and spin game often played by the miners, their &ldquo;science&rdquo; advisors, and supporters this conveniently morphs from &ldquo;recreational suction dredging will have no significant adverse impacts on species and habitats with special legal status if the following conditions are met&rdquo; into the above statement by Senator Olsen. &nbsp;To understand this you need to go to the FONSI documents and read the source material. &nbsp;I made this point during my testimony, but clearly this was part of the science that Senator Olsen did not hear or was not willing to research.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><strong>Criteria for Determining Significance</strong></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">For the purposes of this analysis, the Proposed Program [suction dredging] would result in a significant impact to biological resources if it would meet one or more of the following criteria:</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><strong>Criterion A</strong>: Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFG, USFWS, or NMFS;&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><strong>Criterion B</strong>: Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by CDFG, USFWS, or NMFS;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><strong>Criterion C</strong>: Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means; or&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><strong>Criterion D</strong>: Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=5&amp;sqi=2&amp;ved=0CFcQFjAE&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnrm.dfg.ca.gov%2FFileHandler.ashx%3FDocumentID%3D27399&amp;ei=xHB5UeuCFafXigKRhYDoCg&amp;usg=AFQjCNHwp_14BIWtrIq36SHKW1oYW9ZuyQ&amp;sig2=JKDuM_qHt-67UrEM2GTUGg&amp;bvm=bv.45645796,d.cGE">From Suction Dredge Permitting Program Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report&nbsp;4.3-22 and 23&nbsp;</a></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>So we learn from the above criteria that &ldquo;significance&rdquo; in this context was limited to a narrow spectrum of special class species and habitats rather than all fish and environmental impacts. &nbsp;So any statements that claim that suction dredging has no significant impacts on fish or the environment based on this draft document is grossly overstating the findings and misrepresenting the information presented in this report. &nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>And once we dig deeper into the individual findings on this narrow list of species and habitats, we find that it is conditional on a multitude of factors. &nbsp;If someone reads through the document they will find more than 20 provisions designed to mitigate or minimize the documented or scientifically supported inferences of impacts associated with the activity of suction dredge mining. &nbsp;But sometimes even this extensive menu of provisions was not enough to prevent impacts or risk to these sensitive species and habitats. &nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Off the top of my head I do not know how many of these 20-plus provisions exist or are applicable and sufficient in Oregon. &nbsp;This is one of the main reasons for this moratorium which is made even more urgent and prudent in the face of rapidly increasing permits as well as increasing complaints and violations.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>In addition to these FONSI determinations being dependent on adherence to all or some of the above provisions, there are also some additional restrictions on waters for specific species that need to be met as well. In the California draft analysis they handled this by establishing an (A-H) classification system which included the following classifications among others:</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">(1) Class A: No dredging permitted at any time.</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">(2) Class B: Open to dredging from July 1 through August 31.</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">(3) Class C: Open to dredging from June 1 through September 30.</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">(4) Class D: Open to dredging from July 1 through January 31.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>For vulnerable species that are put most at risk by suction dredging like salmonids&mdash;salmon, steelhead and trout&mdash;the minimum closure for waterways containing those fish starts at Class 3 or 4, but that is not always considered sufficient. &nbsp;For Chinook salmon all waterways containing those fish were designated Class A and closed to dredging all year round&mdash;no exceptions. &nbsp;For Coho salmon the requirements varied from Class A-C depending upon both the condition and the function of those stretches of rivers or streams. &nbsp;With Coho special attention were given to thermal refugia&mdash;those deep, cooler pools where fish tend to congregate to escape the warmer and sometimes fatal water temperatures of summer. &nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Useful knowledge on this scale in Oregon needs to be established during the proposed moratorium along with criteria and mechanisms for making adjustments should impacts arise. &nbsp;Regulation in the absence of monitoring and standards is folly. &nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Nothing in the above or in this oft cited FONSI&mdash;when examined closely&mdash;should lead anyone to believe that small-scale suction dredging is without consequence or risk to fish or the environment. &nbsp;As to Senator Olsen not hearing scientific evidence, I am not sure how to respond. &nbsp;He was in the room when Jack Williams&mdash;a PhD-level fisheries biologist enumerated his concerns and observations. &nbsp;Likewise, he was there when the representative from the Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society distilled their formal comments and findings. &nbsp; I know that the miners claim that they &ldquo;have the science&rdquo; on this&mdash;if there was any science not heard at this hearing it was that &ldquo;science&rdquo; that was silent.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><a href="http://org2.salsalabs.com/o/5868/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=13638">Please let your elected officials in Oregon know how you feel about suction dredging in our rivers</a>. &nbsp;</div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/fonsi-not-fonzie/">FONSI not Fonzie</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cascwild.org/2013/fonsi-not-fonzie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Western Mining Alliance and Brain Surgery by Dentists</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2013/western-mining-alliance-and-brain-surgery-by-dentists/</link>
					<comments>https://cascwild.org/2013/western-mining-alliance-and-brain-surgery-by-dentists/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chetco River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claudia Wise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Greene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph C. Greene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millennium Diggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogue River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Our Wild Salmon Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siltation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steelhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Mining Alliance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cascwild.org/?p=6624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By Bob Ferris Would you go to a dentist if you had serious head aches or needed a brain tumor removed? The obvious answer to that is: No, even though both dentists and brain surgeons are highly educated, work on your head and use drills. But that is basically what the Western Mining Alliance and ... <a title="Western Mining Alliance and Brain Surgery by Dentists" class="read-more" href="https://cascwild.org/2013/western-mining-alliance-and-brain-surgery-by-dentists/" aria-label="Read more about Western Mining Alliance and Brain Surgery by Dentists">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/western-mining-alliance-and-brain-surgery-by-dentists/">Western Mining Alliance and Brain Surgery by Dentists</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>By Bob Ferris</div>
<div>Would you go to a dentist if you had serious head aches or needed a brain tumor removed? The obvious answer to that is: No, even though both dentists and brain surgeons are highly educated, work on your head and use drills. But that is basically what the Western Mining Alliance and their suction dredging allies are asking you to do by rolling out <a href="https://www.cascwild.org/general-response-to-joe-greene/">Joseph Greene</a> and Claudia Wise as experts on suction dredge mining and the risks posed by that activity to our precious rivers and imperiled salmon and steelhead. Actually it is worse than that because the credentials of these two scientists in their own fields make it more akin to asking a senior and skilled dental technician to dig around in your brain pan.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Too harsh? Not really. While this pair of retired US EPA scientists—one a toxicologist (Greene) and the other a physical chemist (Wise)—have certainly provided some good science in their time and in their respective fields, they have aggressively inserted themselves in a debate where they<a href="https://www.cascwild.org/excerpt-fromsucking-up-riverbeds-is-suction-dredging-ruining-your-favorite-trout-stream/"> lack credentials and stature; are behaving unprofessionally; and have serious conflicts of interest. </a>While they are certainly entitled to have their say as private citizens and have said it, now they are acting a lot like uninvited and obnoxious house guests who were supposed to spend one night and ended up staying a week or more.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Wrong Field, Grounding, and Stature</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>Toxicology (Greene) and the physical sciences (Wise) are primarily test tube disciplines and though they share some methodologies and philosophies with field-oriented disciplines like fisheries biology and ecology there are many differences in terms of language, expectations, logic, and awareness.  All are valuable fields and their science meritorious but we also should acknowledge that they attract different minds, personalities and professional approaches.  In short, having skills and experience in one area does not always directly transfer into another.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Now I could go into great detail here on degrees held—which Mr. Greene and Ms. Wise are pretty cagey about—and quality, quantity and thrust of work, but I will use a surrogate device: The New York Times editorial department.  Much has been made on the mining blogs of the fact that two PhD-level fisheries scientists—Bob Hughes and Carol Woody—wrote an opinion piece in the New York Times in January 2012 on the need for reform of the 1872 Mining Act which contained a sentence on suction dredging.  <a href="http://www.goldprospectors.org/Communication/ArticlesandInformation/tabid/153/EntryId/503/New-York-Times-OpEd-article-flawed.aspx">Mr. Greene and Ms. Wise wrote a rebuttal</a> of sorts and were incensed—along with their cadre of supporters—that their piece was not accepted and printed.  The mining community saw this as another example of them not getting a fair shake, but the reality is more revealing.</div>
<div></div>
<div>There are several elements at work here.  First is that while members of the mining community salute this pair and celebrate their self-manufactured stature, others do not.  Most see the supreme irony of a pair of mid-level non-fisheries scientists saying that two senior-level fisheries scientists are “fishes out of water.” The hard truth of the matter is that our intrepid pair simply do not meet the minimum entry level on this issue—i.e., they are not recognized experts in this field in spite of their self-labeling, not even close.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Moreover, there is the writing.  The New York Times has very high editorial standards.  The piece written by Mr. Greene and Ms. Wise is simply not very strong or compelling and has typographical glitches and errors in grammar.  They are certainly entitled to grouse about this rejection but in the end their expectations were unrealistic and their execution wanting.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Unprofessional Behavior</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">“I have reviewed the declaration of Toz Soto filed in support of the plaintiff’s summary judgment in the above-captioned lawsuit as well as the “Summary of Fishery Issues Concerning Suction Dredge Mining” prepared by Jon Grunbaum and dated April 20, 2005.</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">3.  The papers authored by Mr. Grunbaum and Mr. Soto are rife with qualifying statements. Examples are, “could”, “could be”, “appear to be”, “are quite possible”, “assume”, “may not be”, and “should be.” These are not scientific statements and in general represent subjective opinions.” <a href="http://www.goldgold.com/wp-content/pdf/GreeneDeclaration%5B1%5D%5B1%5D.prn2.pdf">From the declaration of Joseph Greene (2005)</a></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div>The above comment by Mr. Greene is telling on a number of different levels.  First his criticism is unfair and demonstrates insensitivity to the challenges of field versus lab science, i.e., you can control variables in the latter and have to design around variables in the former.  He is basically criticizing them for being responsible in their comments and exhibiting prudence.  But there is more here because he is also being disingenuous.  To explore the depth and implications of this latter issue we have only to look at Mr. Greene’s own publications.</div>
<div></div>
<div>In <a href="http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/31/30200.pdf">Mr. Greene’s co-authored 1996 pape</a>r on dye toxicity we see the following phrases:  Almost certainly exists…It probably is significant…is likely to result…this, in turn, suggests…may be a strong function…could be due…there is little reason to believe…is probably strongly affected.  These statements are very similar to those Mr. Greene snidely criticizes above.  But my all-time favorite from this paper is: it is not possible to rule out the possibility that&#8230;</div>
<div></div>
<div>To be clear, I am not criticizing this paper nor am I criticizing Mr. Greene or his co-author for inserting qualifying language or speculating in the absence of testing or quantifying doubt about why certain effects were not observed or manifested during their laboratory testing.  All this is prudent and what we expect from experts.  What I criticize is his calling out other scientists for engaging in the same exercise and making this seem—at least to his “audience”—something unusual, underhanded or compromising of their expert conclusions.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">64 See Email from Joe Greene, supra note 31. Greene erroneously relies on the Oregon State University study, stating that “Dr. Bayley’s study and other works confirm that even when analyzed from a cumulative effects perspective, there is no reason to believe that suction dredge mining is deleterious to fish.” Id. Bayley’s study did not actually test the cumulative effects of suction dredge mining due to the constraints of the experiment. <a href="http://law.lclark.edu/live/files/6134-403delcottopdf">Adrianne Delcotto Suction Dredge Mining: The United States Forest Service Hands Miners the Golden Ticket in Environmental Law Vol. 40 No. 3</a></div>
<div></div>
<div>Mr. Greene’s attention to detail is often lacking.  Whether this is just a question of lack of rigor or some larger issue is not completely clear.  He has made the above erroneous statement repeatedly in letters and other communications.  This and other easily verifiable misstatements have been brought to his attention, and I can see no evidence of self-editing.  As science is constantly evolving and becoming more complex, we all frequently adjust our comments in light of more current findings.  When one does not do so, there is a problem.  My sense is that Mr. Greene is driven much more by his hobby and politics than science.</div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"> “A lifetime of biological testing on toxicity and nutrient pollution in the aquatic environment provides a sound basis for appreciating the magnitude of impacts associated with the asserted environmental contaminants, and gives a quantitative perspective generally lacking in general biologists, which leaves them less able to ascertain which environmental effects are significant and which aren’t.”  <a href="http://westernminingalliance.org/?page_id=1694">Joe Greene Letter to Katharine Carter North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board March 23, 2010 </a></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div>The field of science is full of egos, but rarely do you see them get as out of control as the above and with less reason.  Mr. Greene frequently talks about his 30-year experience and 14-page resume, but is very elusive about basic information such as where he went to school and what degree or degrees he holds.  In the world of science this is not normal.  We talk openly about our degrees and publications.  Perhaps Mr. Greene is unaware that since he entered college in the late 1950s that all sub-disciplines of the biological sciences have become more quantitative in their approaches.  Yes we still talk about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_envy">“Physics envy”</a> but that is not because we lack quantitative skills or understanding but rather that we have to work much harder and use increasingly complicated statistics and multivariate analyses to answer our questions in situations where we have little or no control over the variables.  Reviewing Mr. Greene’s body of work, I see scant employment of these higher order analyses, certainly nothing to justify his vaunted opinion of his skills versus those with more advanced credentials that he frequently criticizes.</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div><strong>Vested Parties and Conflicts of Interests</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>And now we come to what brings our two retired scientists to the dance in the first place—they are both officers in the <a href="http://www.millenniumdiggers.com/us.shtml">Millennium Diggers</a> organization.  In addition, <a href="http://www.ewg.org/mining/owners/overview.php?cust_id=703881">Mr. Greene</a>, his <a href="http://www.ewg.org/mining/owners/overview.php?cust_id=2132558">wife</a> and partners owned mining claims in Oregon totaling several hundred acres of federal public land.  So they are participants and at least one of them was financially vested in the outcome of this debate.  That for me and many others raises red flags about their participation in this debate and the relative value of their input.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Now I understand as a fisherman and one who frequently uses waterways for other forms of recreation that I have a vested interest in this issue and therefore a conflict.  I freely admit that my views are colored by my recreational activities, that said, I think my situation and that of other anglers in the conservation arena differs.  How?  I think it is a matter of our relationship with those waters and our attitudes towards what I would call mitigating stewardship.  I do fish, raft, and kayak but I spend more of my spare time restoring and caring for those resources than I do utilizing them.  My wife and I, for instance, have been on more weekend river clean-ups or riparian tree plantings than we have been on fishing trips.  When I lived on the Chesapeake I planted way more oysters than I ate and when we lived in Santa Barbara we dedicated more of  our free time to habitat restoration or other actions that raised public awareness than we did enjoying our past-times.</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div><a title="" href="https://www.cascwild.org/western-mining-alliance-and-brain-surgery-by-dentists/page-one-of-joe-greene-chetco-letter/" target="" rel="attachment wp-att-6625 noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-6625 alignnone" title="Page one of Joe Greene Chetco Letter" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Page-one-of-Joe-Greene-Chetco-Letter-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-6626 alignnone" title="Joe Greene Chetco River Letter page 2" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Joe-Greene-Chetco-River-Letter-page-2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /><a title="" href="https://www.cascwild.org/western-mining-alliance-and-brain-surgery-by-dentists/joe-greene-chetco-river-letter-page-2/" target="" rel="attachment wp-att-6626 noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-6627 alignnone" title="Joe Greene Chetco River Letter page 3" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Joe-Greene-Chetco-River-Letter-page-3-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></div>
<div></div>
<p>Yes, suction dredgers like Mr. Greene remove some fishing lead from waterways but that is a byproduct of materials movement and gravity, not proactive stewardship.  Mr. Greene’s version of proactive stewardship appears to be his lobbying actions to make sure that cars, trucks and OHVs are still allowed to drive through the waters of the cherished Chetco River.</p>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">“There is no science supporting the claims that vehicular traffic crossing the river is damaging it.” Joseph C. Greene Research Biologist USEPA Retired</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div>He argues for this—as he typically does—via a misleading statement about documentation of damage.  Yes there is likely no specific science indicating that vehicle traffic is harming the Chetco.  That is very different, however, than saying vehicles driven through the river are not compromising water quality or harming fish habitat.  There is a <a href="http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/pdf/LowWaterCrossings/Lo_pdf/AppD.pdf">body of science with sufficient scope of inference</a> to conclude that driving vehicles through most waterways impacts fisheries.   As humans we would hope that we would be able to learn from the missteps and mistakes of others rather than having to do the same ill-advised actions time after time.</div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">“There is no science showing oil and other chemicals washed off vehicles harm the river any more than that of chemicals that wash off roads.  The State Fish and Game [sic] Department has never investigated industry along the river because fish survivability has never been impacted.” Joseph C. Greene Research Biologist USEPA Retired.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The above is a novel, school-yard argument, but how is it in any way biologically defensible?  Something does not have to be worse than something else to have an impact.  It is biologically prudent to minimize road runoff just as it is biologically prudent to keep vehicles out of waterways wherever possible.  The two are not in conflict nor are they mutually exclusive.  Further the state agency is the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife rather than “game” and it looks like Mr. Greene has failed to notice the general decline in native salmon fisheries over the last fifty years which happened during the time that vehicles were driving through the river.</div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">“This issue is best left to the local residents of Curry County.  Please vote no on House Bill 3251.” Joseph C. Greene Research Biologist USEPA Retired.</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div>This last section is also interesting.  Perhaps Mr. Greene forgets that he lives in Philomath which is Benton County not Curry.  Further this bill deals with Oregon state lands not Curry County’s, and we have fish that are of concern nationally and internationally.  All of this demands a broader public involvement.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Applicable Standards and Thresholds of Proof</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">Section 7 (2) Each Federal agency shall, in consultation with and with the assistance of the Secretary, insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency (hereinafter in this section referred to as an ‘‘agency action’’) is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species which is determined by the Secretary, after consultation as appropriate with affected States, to be critical, unless such agency has been granted an exemption for such action by the Committee pursuant to subsection (h) of this section. In fulfilling the requirements of this paragraph each agency shall use the best scientific and commercial data available.  Section 7 (2) of the Endangered Species Act (1973)</div>
<div></div>
<div>The Endangered Species Act and other similar pieces of legislation are rightfully designed to give the benefit of the doubt to species that are on the list because they require special protections.  The Act does not say that all actions can take place unless they are proven to cause harm—there is an element of the precautionary principle (i.e., first do no harm) explicitly woven into the Act.  This is a thread or theme that seems to escape Mr. Greene and Ms. Wise which is interesting given that so much of what the USEPA does unfolds in a similar fashion—i.e., proceed with caution and require reasonable proof of safety prior to use.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Certainly they and their colleagues in the mining sector have provided studies that indicate minimal or temporary harm.  Fair enough, but there are also many studies that indicate actual harm to individuals within an imperiled population, their supporting food cycles, or the variety of habitats they need to survive.  Fisheries scientists and other toxicologists (when it comes to the release of sequestered mercury) are simply exercising the same prudence and commendable caution exhibited in the above cited paper on fabric dyes or the cautionary wording included in Ms. Wise’s work with Douglas firs and elements of climate change.</div>
<div></div>
<div>This above caution should also be anticipatory.  Suction dredging permits in Oregon have doubled recently.  And there are groups in California and elsewhere such as <a href="http://www.goldpancalifornia.com/mike-dunn-group-mining-project-adventure-oregon-gold-p1.php">Gold Pan California</a> and The New 49er’s that are looking to maximize the number of permits through schemes to put multiple permit holders simultaneously on claims—sort of a condominium scheme that seems hardly legal or ethical.  Should not the most responsible action of any legislature or agency seeing a rapid rise of any activity with negative or unknown consequences be to say “time out” until more is known?</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>And then there is the Western Mining Alliance</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">“THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT- they [Gold Pan California] want you to sign in as joe public and NOT AS MINERS. Create a name like &#8220;naturelover2&#8221; or &#8220;fielddreamer&#8221; or &#8220;soccermom&#8221; or something that makes you sound like you are the public and NOT MINERS. They want you to make pro-miner comments, but not to the point that you sound like miners- they want it to sound like you are the common public standing up for the miners.</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">There needs to be a lot of buzz on this so it gets picked up by bigger and bigger press. The more buzz we create about the topic, the more exposure it will get.” <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spma2/message/3137">E-mail by Rick Solinsky suction dredger and co-founder of Western Mining Alliance</a>.</div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div>The Western Mining Alliance itself is a castle of deceit. Its “.org” designation makes one think that it is a benign 501(c)3 non-profit organization though it is not registered as such. Its president goes by the moniker of Molon Labe which is an alias. Molon Labe is the phrase reportedly uttered by the Spartan king Leonidas to the Persians at Thermopile. It basically means <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molon_labe">“come and take.”</a> It seems in poor taste that this modern day small force that aggressively promotes <a href="http://westernminingalliance.org/?p=1428">bad science</a>,<a href="http://www.goldgold.com/tag/how-to-find-gold-2"> loopholes</a> and <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spma2/message/3137">subterfuge</a> like the above has elected to use this phrase that is associated with one of the most straight-forward and courageous acts in history.  But I suppose in all of this gold fever and greed often bring out the worst in mankind.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>Needed Actions:</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a href="https://www.cascwild.org/oregon-suction-dredge-hearing-april-15-2013-3pm/"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Attend Suction Dredge Moratorium hearing Monday April 15, 2013 in Salem and tell your friends</span></a></div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a href="http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5868/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=13638">Express support for moratorium until the science indicates that suction dredging is safe for salmon, steelhead and supporting aquatic ecosystems.</a></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div><strong>Other Documents:</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a href="https://www.cascwild.org/oregon-chapter-of-the-american-fisheries-society-on-suction-dredging/">Oregon Chapter American Fisheries Society Suction Dredging Documents</a></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"><a href="https://www.cascwild.org/excerpt-fromsucking-up-riverbeds-is-suction-dredging-ruining-your-favorite-trout-stream/">Suction Dredging Article by Ted Williams in Fly Rod and Reel Magazine</a></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div>
<div></div><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/western-mining-alliance-and-brain-surgery-by-dentists/">Western Mining Alliance and Brain Surgery by Dentists</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cascwild.org/2013/western-mining-alliance-and-brain-surgery-by-dentists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Water Boards Letter on Suction Dredge Mining</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2013/california-state-water-board-letter-on-suction-dredge-mining/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Water Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Our Wild Salmon Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cascwild.org/?p=6325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is a copy of the California State Water Board&#8217;s letter on suction dredging urging a continuation of the suction dredging moratorium in California. &#160;Please click twice on each page to see a full sized image. &#160; &#160; &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/california-state-water-board-letter-on-suction-dredge-mining/">California Water Boards Letter on Suction Dredge Mining</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a copy of the California State Water Board&rsquo;s letter on suction dredging urging a continuation of the suction dredging moratorium in California. &nbsp;Please click twice on each page to see a full sized image.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cascwild.org/california-state-water-board-letter-on-suction-dredge-mining/water-board-suction-dredge-letter-page-1-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-6356"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-6356" height="388" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Water-Board-Suction-Dredge-Letter-page-11-300x388.jpg" title="Water Board Suction Dredge Letter page 1" width="300" /></a><a href="https://www.cascwild.org/california-state-water-board-letter-on-suction-dredge-mining/water-board-page-2-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-6357"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-6357" height="388" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Water-Board-Page-21-300x388.jpg" title="Water Board Page 2" width="300" /></a><a href="https://www.cascwild.org/california-state-water-board-letter-on-suction-dredge-mining/water-board-page-3-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-6358"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-6358" height="388" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Water-Board-page-31-300x388.jpg" title="Water Board page 3" width="300" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>&nbsp;</div><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/california-state-water-board-letter-on-suction-dredge-mining/">California Water Boards Letter on Suction Dredge Mining</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press Release: Legislation Introduced to Protect Water Quality and Wild Salmon in Oregon</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2013/press-release-legislation-introduced-to-protect-water-quality-and-wild-salmon-in-oregon/</link>
					<comments>https://cascwild.org/2013/press-release-legislation-introduced-to-protect-water-quality-and-wild-salmon-in-oregon/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Page Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign News Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cascadia Wildlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogue River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save Our Wild Salmon Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save the Wild Rogue River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 401]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seantor Bates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Bill 401]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wild Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wild salmon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.old.cascwild.org/?p=5752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>February 19, 2013 — Local businesses, outdoor enthusiasts, and conservation organizations applaud the recent introduction of Senate Bill 401 by Senator Alan Bates (D-Medford/Ashland) which would protect 30 rivers as State Scenic Waterways in recognition of their outstanding scenic vistas, value to fish and wildlife, and importance as sources of drinking water.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/press-release-legislation-introduced-to-protect-water-quality-and-wild-salmon-in-oregon/">Press Release: Legislation Introduced to Protect Water Quality and Wild Salmon in Oregon</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For immediate release</strong><br />
February 19, 2013</p>
<p><strong>Contact</strong><br />
John Ward, Rogue Flyfishers (Medford), 541.482.2859<br />
Frank Armendariz, River Trail Outfitters (Eugene), 541.228.4084</p>
<p>Salem, OR — Local businesses, outdoor enthusiasts, and conservation organizations applaud the recent introduction of Senate Bill 401 by Senator Alan Bates (D-Medford/Ashland) which would protect 30 rivers as State Scenic Waterways in recognition of their outstanding scenic vistas, value to fish and wildlife, and importance as sources of drinking water.</p>
<p>“Safeguarded rivers attract river enthusiasts, which means more business and more people enjoying them for the long term,” says Frank Armendariz, owner of River Trail Outfitters in Eugene. “As our population grows so will demand for river access, and that underscores the critical need to protect these special rivers.”</p>
<p><a href="https://www.old.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/DSC_00842.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5758" title="DSC_0084" src="https://www.old.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/DSC_00842-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>SB 401 would protect segments of the Rogue, Illinois, South Umpqua, Grande Ronde, Sandy, Molalla, and other renowned rivers across the state. A State Scenic Waterway designation maintains free-flowing waters in their natural state, and protects water quality and quantity at a level necessary for municipal sources, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Inclusion in the system also means these rivers would be protected from damaging suction dredge mining, a practice involving the use of gasoline-powered vacuums, mounted on floating rafts, to suck up riverbed sands and gravels in search of gold.</p>
<p>“World-class rivers like the Illinois, Rogue, and South Umpqua have become ground zero for destructive suction dredge mining in our state, and this practice is impacting imperiled wild salmon runs,” says John Ward of Rogue Flyfishers. “This designation will benefit salmon recovery as water quality and fish habitat get protected.”</p>
<p>California placed a moratorium on suction dredge mining in 2010 due to its impacts on imperiled salmon. With the moratorium in place and gold prices near all-time highs, many California suction dredge miners have moved operations north to target Oregon rivers, including the Rogue, Illinois, and South Umpqua.</p>
<p>Increases in suction dredging in Oregon on places like the Rogue River have led to complaints from nearby landowners of illegal trespassing and noisy engines running in the river, as well as river damage to salmon habitat.</p>
<p>If successful,  SB 401 would represent the third addition to the State Scenic Waterway system. In 1970, Oregonians voted by a two-to-one margin to create the system, following a successful citizens’ initiative petition. The program originally contained all or part of six rivers but has grown through additional initiatives to include 19 rivers as well as Waldo Lake.  The system was last updated in 1988.</p>
<p>####</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leg.state.or.us/13reg/measpdf/sb0400.dir/sb0401.intro.pdf">Click here</a> to read SB 401.<br />
<a href="https://www.old.cascwild.org/campaigns/save-our-wild-salmon-heritage/suction-dredging-and-high-banking-for-gold/">Click here</a> for more information on the impacts of suction dredge mining.</p><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/press-release-legislation-introduced-to-protect-water-quality-and-wild-salmon-in-oregon/">Press Release: Legislation Introduced to Protect Water Quality and Wild Salmon in Oregon</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cascwild.org/2013/press-release-legislation-introduced-to-protect-water-quality-and-wild-salmon-in-oregon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bates Champions Waterways</title>
		<link>https://cascwild.org/2013/bates-champions-waterways/</link>
					<comments>https://cascwild.org/2013/bates-champions-waterways/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Page Hot Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Bates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Scenic Waterways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suction dredging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suction Dredging and High Banking for Gold]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cascwild.org/?p=5600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; &#160; &#160; DR. ALAN BATES State Senator, District 3&#160; Ashland, Jacksonville, Medford, Phoenix, Talent&#160; &#160; Deputy Majority Leader Co-chair, Human Services Joint Subcommittee Member, Joint Ways &#38; Means &#160;&#160; &#160; &#160; News Release &#160; February 11, 2013 &#160; CONTACT: &#160; &#160; &#160;Jeff Scroggin (503) 986-1703 or &#160;sen.alanbates@state.or.us &#160; Bates stands up for Southern Oregon ... <a title="Bates Champions Waterways" class="read-more" href="https://cascwild.org/2013/bates-champions-waterways/" aria-label="Read more about Bates Champions Waterways">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/bates-champions-waterways/">Bates Champions Waterways</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.cascwild.org/bates-champions-waterways/alan-bates-oregon-seal/" rel="attachment wp-att-5601"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5601" height="188" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Alan-Bates-Oregon-Seal.png" title="Alan Bates Oregon Seal" width="188" /></a></p>
<div><a href="https://www.cascwild.org/bates-champions-waterways/alan-bates/" rel="attachment wp-att-5602"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" class="alignright size-full wp-image-5602" height="278" src="https://www.cascwild.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/alan-bates.jpg" title="alan bates" width="185" /></a></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 80px; text-align: center;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 80px; text-align: center;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 80px; text-align: center;"><strong><span style="font-size:16px;">DR. ALAN BATES</span></strong></div>
<div style="margin-left: 80px; text-align: center;">State Senator, District 3&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-left: 80px; text-align: center;">Ashland, Jacksonville, Medford, Phoenix, Talent&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Deputy Majority Leader</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Co-chair, Human Services Joint Subcommittee</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">Member, Joint Ways &amp; Means</div>
<div>&nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><strong><span style="font-size:16px;">News Release</span></strong></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>February 11, 2013</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>CONTACT: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Jeff Scroggin (503) 986-1703 or &nbsp;<a href="mailto:sen.alanbates@state.or.us">sen.alanbates@state.or.us</a></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>Bates stands up for Southern Oregon rivers and property owners</strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em>Legislation will protect region&rsquo;s legacy of clean water and river recreation</em></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>SALEM&mdash;Today, Senator Alan Bates (D-Medford) joined a coalition of fishers, rafters, conservationists, and other river users to encourage the state to evaluate and potentially curb a new wave of suction-dredge mining on the Rogue, Chetco, and other area rivers and creeks.&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&ldquo;Southern Oregon is home to thousands of us who consider our peaceful, pristine rivers a legacy to pass on to the next generation,&rdquo; said Bates. &ldquo;The dramatic increase in this potentially harmful practice may have serious impacts on fish, recreational users, conservationists and affected property owners.&rdquo;&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Suction dredging, which is the practice of vacuuming up a river bed with a motorized raft to obtain gold, has become more prevalent over the past decade, growing from a few hundred permits a decade ago to nearly 2000 permits last year. &ldquo;Clean water and healthy fish are cherished Oregon values, and I&rsquo;m calling for hearings and a thoughtful discovery process to ensure protection for these threatened rivers and streams,&rdquo; said Bates.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Joining Senator Bates was John Ward of Rogue Flyfishers, who spoke in support of a concept that would add new miles to the successful State Scenic Waterways program for the first time since 1988. &ldquo;We must protect Southern Oregon and the rest of the state from new, destructive behaviors by expanding the State Scenic Waterways program. This move would be good for fishermen and for the recreational fishing industry,&rdquo; said Ward.&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Bates will continue to hear from local residents, including property owners, miners, local businesses, and he remains open-minded about possible solutions. &ldquo;If it&rsquo;s bad for our rivers and streams, then it should not be allowed in the most vulnerable and beautiful portions of those waters,&rdquo; said Bates. &nbsp;&ldquo;We must ensure that miners offset the costs to property owners and other river users &ndash; and we must ensure as little damage to our rivers as possible.&rdquo;&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Expansion of scenic waterways as proposed in SB 401 would increase protections from just one-third of 1 percent of Oregon&rsquo;s rivers and streams to only one-half of 1 percent.&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Senator Bates serves on the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee and is the Deputy Majority Whip.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">###</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<p>Editors Note: Cascadia Wildlands is part of a broad coalition of conservation, environmental, angler, and recreationalist supporting this legislation.&nbsp;</p><p>The post <a href="https://cascwild.org/2013/bates-champions-waterways/">Bates Champions Waterways</a> first appeared on <a href="https://cascwild.org">Cascadia Wildlands</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://cascwild.org/2013/bates-champions-waterways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: cascwild.org @ 2026-07-15 01:21:57 by W3 Total Cache
-->